Public Schools Segregation Essay

I was recently struck by one of the political studys in the SacramentoBee newspaper, which presented an image comparison of drinking fountains in two conditions. It quickly reminded me of the racist Jim genus Corvus laws from the 1880s-1960s and how racial segregation existed some everywhere in the United States at that time. However, I realize that this cartoon doesnt portray the concept of racial segregation with a Jim Crow joke, but it makes a commentary on social segregation among general schools in the United States to sidereal day.I slowly realized that all Ameri tooshie everyday schools are non the same due to financing. The huge dispute exists in the public school system beca delectation their funding is associated with local holding levyes. If a school is located in an lavish area with wealthier residents who stipend high property taxes, schools exit receive much funding ( instruct supporting 1). Do you think this system is fair? If I select affluent parents , they probably would answer that they pay high property taxes, so their coin should go straight to nourish public schools in their areas.Meanwhile, if I were to ask parents in low socioeconomic areas, they would say that funds should be distributed from the put in and not by the county, which would succor in reducing the inequality amid schools. Although sharing funds is not fair for m both affluent heap who pay more taxes, we should encourage state governments to aid the inadequateer schools more because it helps to cut poverty and prevent crimes in reject income neighborhoods. The first reason that poorer schools should perk up more funds is to reduce poverty.People in low-income areas might not get the direct effect from school funding, but in the in store(predicate), their kids volition be benefited greatly. For those in the low income bracket, education goat be a legitimate way to help them climb out of poverty. However, in reality, well-nigh of these poorer schoo ls instantly are still not treated equally as their richer counterparts. Lisa B overleap, Chicago Tribune reporter reviewed the vast difference between two public schools in the Chicago area to illustrate this point.The first school, Taft Elementary School in Lockport weedt offer students either arts, language or technology classes because of the limited budget for sale. Meanwhile, Rondout Elementary School, near Lake Forest, offers language programs much(prenominal) as Spanish in every grade including kindergarten. Most students use laptops in the class, and they can enjoy band and chorus classes. They can bring to study various art, drama and dance as well (Black 1). If poor pincerren had the same fortune as their counterparts, imagine the growth it could represent to them educational.If they enjoyed studying, they could tend on to obtain higher education by attending to colleges, heart and soul bettor-paying jobs. Therefore, funds should be available for all people. Yo ung minds deserve the opportunity to choose the programs that they want to study. They should be able to study art and any other subject, as they desire to, regardless of how much property tax their parents pay. In general, I believe that a good education is the buttocks that can pave the way to a better quality of life. asunder from reducing poverty, preventing crimes is another reason that poorer schools should receive more funds. Crimes in lower income areas derive from being unable to sustain a decent living. These types of crimes can be directly connected to a lack of education and opportunity. Geoffrey Wodtke, a sociologist at the University of Michigan, mentions in his article that kids in poor neighborhood fork out less chance to graduate from high school (Wodtke 1). He overly statesPoor neighborhoods are isolated and racially segregated, with none of the quality schools, day care, grocery stores, pharmacies, and parks that can help promote a boors development and acad emic achievement and they are disproportionately smoggy, crime-ridden and dilapidated. every last(predicate) of these factors, the researchers note, have been linked to poor performance in school, often culminating in dropouts. (1) Wodtke claims that poor neighborhoods affect school performance, and this can impact a childs learning directly.Some children quit the schools because they have no pursuance in schooling. Dropping out is and having no high school sheepskin will limit a job opportunities. When they are not do for many jobs, they cant escape the pitfalls of poverty. Therefore, some of them end up finding illegal ways to make money while others relate themselves with gangs (Wodtke 2). This is the reason why school is so important, because it is a good stance to obtain children on equal footing educationally with the chance to better themselves in the future.However, schools in low-income areas still take more funds to founder having a pastiche of programs such as l anguage, art and sports. Schools also need to be able to hire and retain qualified teachers. Moreover, every school should be able to afford sport programs, which is a good somatic outlet for youthful energy and encourages good health and teamwork. Art programs should also be available because they provide an outlet to express creativity. A wider variety of activities and educational alternatives can create brighter and more promising futures if given the opportunities.These children can become doctors, football players or artists in the future as retentive as they get a fair amount of support from the beginning. Its difficult to change the living environment in poorer neighborhoods, but we can start by improving the school system to reshape the future of that community. Some people think that pouring money into poor schools is wasteful. They believe the reason schools become poorly performing ones is because they are full of under-achieving students who lack interest in the curri culum. Even if some schools get more funds, it will not change any matter.Its give care treating symptoms, but not starting time at the root of the problem. They believe that the government should provide more funding to schools with higher achieving students who potentially will become successful contributing members of the community. In other words, the state government should invest in the right schools and students. However, I believe this thought to be completely wrong. People who believe this will never know the potential of students in lower-income schools unless they are given a fair and equal opportunity to succeed.If poorer schools receive more funding, they will be able to provide better facilities and a stronger variety in the curriculum. These factors would sum up the chances that we see more students grow into productive and successful adults despite advent from lower class surroundings. When every school has the same resources and variety of programs available to their youths, political cartoons like this one will be a thing of the past because the educational systems inequalities will no protracted be a joke.We should call for action on the funding to purify poorer schools because education can help in reducing poverty and crimes in these neighborhoods. Although affluent parents who work harder and pay more property taxes might equal an idea of distributed funding to poor schools, they should think about economic consequences. If a gap between rich schools and poor schools is still expanding, how can the children of today become responsible adults in the future?If this country is the land of emancipation and opportunity for everyone, I should hope that schools would be the first place to start by giving equal opportunities to all children. Poorer schools should receive equal opportunities like those of the children in wealthier communities. Schools should be a sacred place where all children of any social standing are afforded the same opportunities of unlimited educational growth. The more we see children shine in their youth, the more likely they will scrape up up to become successful in the future and this will help strengthen the future of the United States socially and economically.